For me, I think having 5k as their minimum sBREED should be the standard. Since a lot can obtain hundreds of sBREEDS.
Section 2, (c). What is the basis of only having 6 months term for a jury?
This is to curb the possible or the potential to monopoly. This is to also promote a healthy governance and present new goals or set of list for improvements each term. Itâs like keeping tracks on what and which areas the team has to work on. Basically, itâs like a limit but more of a goal setter. I think 6 months in each term is enough.
knowledge tests are easy since most answers can be googled or search through the projectâs vast resources (mediume, website, twitter, discord, whitepaper) so that knowledge test point is moot tbh.
1 Like
Do you think it should be longer? Iâm still torn, tbh.
But given that the role can have 3 consecutive terms, if the jury is doing well, we can re-elect them up to the 3rd term to help ensure that they can help the projects grow. But if theyâre not doing well or they realize the role is not something they excel in, they can step down after 6mos - which is beneficial for the DAO too.
I agree with you! I think testing the knowledge of the applicants will be easy for us to evaluate on whether to nominate them or not.
I havenât seen it was mentioned anywhere why only 6 months. But to tell your frankly, 6 months will be enough just merely screening the proposals. Also, it would be beneficial if we have new sets of Jury so decisions can be made without bias. Actually, 2 terms shall be okay with 6 months per term.
Iâm thinking having a jury memberâs term be 6 months long is fair enough. To promote good administration and to provide new goals or lists of suggestions for advancements at the end of each term. Itâs an advantage for the team to see what and where they need to focus their efforts.
knowing that those chosen are knowledgeable enough means that the community can establish significant trust to the project. i totally am with you on this one 
Agree with you on this one. Might want the community to be involved in a certain degree. Knowledge should be present of course.
Right! Choosing the candidate must be well oriented with their upcoming responsibilities if they ever get chosen.
I agree, for sure the team will make sure that the chose one is going to be oriented by the them too donât you think?
You have a fair argument. What other options do you suggest if we cannot fully trust the knowledge test? How can we determine if such nominees are indeed qualified?
The Proposal Juryâs role is critical so one should really be a great fit! Hoping that the selection process would be extracted thoroughly.
You do have a point there. But of course, in terms of knowledge test, the questions asked are of course not by the book or canât easily be answered by just looking through resources. Imagine problem solving tests? I think theyâre referring to that kind of questions or like questions from Physics wherein you came up with your own formula to solve a certain problem. Itâs how you will tackle that problem. Itâs a combination of knowledge that you have that will help answer the problem. I hope you get my point. 
2 Likes
This is an interesting point, should there be a âknowledge testâ, it would be focused on highlighting the strengths of the applicants while taking into consideration the general audience- we will most definitely take into account inclusivity in order for everyone to have a fair shot.
Intriguing suggestion, would you suggest community members submitting questions as well as prompts and topics for the âknowledge testâ? This could probably be a combination of questions submitted but the breederDAO community as well as questions curated by the breederDAO team.
Yes! We most definitely agree that the level of enthusiasm does not always equate to level of expertise, which is why we are open to ideas such as âknowledge testsâ to diversify the criteria and to further help us narrow down our choices 
! Feel free to drop any suggestions that might be a good fit for the process.
We definitely understand the concern! We want you to think of the long term in regards to sBreed. Since the price wonât remain the same as we grow, soon enough the ease of purchase to vote becomes more proportional with the experience level in the community within the majority. That being said however, what processes would you like us to observe in terms of time tracking? Weâd appreciate any and all suggestions!
1 Like
Yes, thatâd be good! Community members can send questions - but I donât think voting would follow. Itâll be the core teamâs final decision which questions would be used for the knowledge test.
If we vote on it, then those nominated would be able to prepare. Lol. Maybe what we can vote on instead is the criteria which the core team would follow when choosing final questions (ie. it should be relevant today, it should include questions about other DAOs, etc.)