Yes i believe users should have staked breed
Can you expound on participation more? What are the specifics?
to get the sBREED you need to stake BREED
I mean what does it actually mean to participate right? Is it commenting or voting?
Weâd love to hear from the team whatâs the thought process going on for this particular issue.
Maybe we can add how delegation actually works here? Plus the difference between a regular memeber with sBREED and those in the top 100 as stated in Article III.
This actually sounds like a great idea.
They should! Thatâs their primary step after being elected. They need to know their responsibilities and duties.
The fact I can read your post means youâre already participating.
Are you suggesting some kind of a VIP status for the top 100 sBREED holders?
Hi! Iâm new here and Iâve been reading all the convos here and learning a looot!
That said though, I am not sure if this would also mean that the minimum requirement to be nominated as Jury would be of 1 sBREED ? This might prove too lax of a requirement.
Maybe the team should consider making set guidelines that cover investors and non-investors in terms of the sBreed they hold and what they can and canât do? I think itâd be a great idea!
Would be great to redefine and specify participation in section 1 so itâs clearer.
Divide them by the number of sBREED they have? Like a hierarchy?
Hi Kenneth, with the 5000 SBreed minimum to be able to vote and participate in the DAO process, we believe we have the necessary safeguards in place to prevent possible manipulation. That being said, our team of moderators will do their best to ensure clean conversations and prevention against negative actions towards BreederDAO.
We believe that a bi-yearly term allow the community to view Jury members within a reasonable metric standard to gauge their performance for the next possible term, and if they would like to re-elect those particular officials for the same role. Since the role will require revision, review, and editing of proposals, six months allows us to see their perfomance through various proposals and ratified bills and allow community members to conclude their effectiveness and ability. However, if you feel as if though a longer or shorter term would be more beneficial, let us know your thoughts!
Weâd like to hear the communityâs suggestions on what the knowledge test should encompass/cover if ever, but as much as possible weâd like it to be one that can be answered by nominees and candidates who are knowledgeable enough about BreederDAO and the industry at the same time not be too intimidating.
Great suggestion, weâd definitely want the community to take a vote
on the coverage and criteria of the knowledge test, should there be one. We at Breederdao, want the community as involved as possible so feel free to comment on what youâd like to see in terms of coverage/criteria in a knowledge test.
Hi! external circumstances may result in premature end of term for Court Members. That being said, Article IV, Section 3F outlines the procedure in place as to when such a situation does occur, in order to ensure continuity within the DAO system.
Welcome to the community bella! Nice seeing you here, your comment is appreciated.