Me too, I’m sure they will come up with something good and applicable.
I think this is really something they need to pay more attention too. 
1 Like
That’s right, and when they do I’m they will consider every angle that will benefit everyone, like they always do.
This will give more chances for the proposals that deserves a second chance and recognition.
I’m certain we should all look forward to this. 
Correct! Proper reading and proper investigation so that, that proposal won’t fall into the plagiarism category.
Agree! Who knows? By revising it, it will stand out more compare to other proposals.
That’s good to know then.
The jury should be keen to details and pay attention to every little detail. Sounds like too much of a work, but it has to be done to prevent plagiarism
1 Like
This increases the chances for other proposals to be recognized.
That is correct. Their hard work will eventually pay off and we’ll have a smooth process. 
Exactly! That’s why it’s better to revise it instead of rejecting it. But of course, the jury will be the one to decide that.
Waiting for that! I’m sure since the team is working hard. I’m sure we’ll attain that soon!
It also seems like the team is providing specific details per article which is good.
1 Like
I agree! This sounds like a good point.
That would be a lot of work for the jury members. But, the community will also have a role in this. As mentioned in Section 4 - Deliberation process,
And, with this clause, the deliberation process could become a collective discussions with the help of us, the community, to help lessen the burden of the jury to determine whether the proposal is deemed violative, or plagiarized to be specific.
What do you guys think?
Yes! I’m excited to see more revisions and updates.
Definitely, the team is always precise on the work they do! Really impressive!
That’s actually right! That way, jury members save time determining facts with such collective information.
1 Like
It’s great to see that this article emphasized the rejection of a proposal in a sense of how the process will be working. Section 4 is a very important matter and is one major assurance that proposals are taken very seriously and is equally given the chance for discussion.